Message #2044

[SEVEN THUNDERS]

Should we be concerned that Darwinism is being taught in public schools?

The thing I like about ID is that it is "offensive" and not "defensive" to the Evolution/Uniformitarian Model (EU)  and secular science, and thus puts the burden of proof on EU and secular science, whereas Creationism is "defensive" and is forced into a situation of putting the burden of proof on itself.  So for the first time since Evolutionists have abducted science some 140 years ago they are, alas, on the defensive, themselves, due to ID, and in fact, their model is "THREATENED" and they are feeling the heat of extinction.  !  No pun intended! 

In school science curriculums I think a variety of "models" should be examined (EU, Creationism, ID, etc.) and students should be allowed to draw their own conclusions.  In philosophical studies not just one philosophy is studied, but an assortment of key philosophies, same with religious studies, and political science is the same way, not just communism is studied (I hope).

Personally, I believe we are headed towards a MAJOR scientific paradigm shift in which there will be a "scientific revolution".  It will create a vacuum for a new predominant model antithetical to EU to emerge, and I suspect it will be a "Vera Science" (True Science).