Author Topic: The beast that thou sawest was, and is not  (Read 730 times)

Offline cizz

  • Administrator
  • Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
Re: The beast that thou sawest was, and is not
« Reply #15 on: January 23, 2012, 03:24:47 pm »
That makes sense sister! We do flip reverse everything!

It occured to me this morning to look up the word "touch"...where the woman told the serpent they weren't even to touch the "fruit"..she didn't say they couldn't touch the tree just not the fruit..

That word "touch" is naga`

http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H5060&t=KJV

I didn't realize it was also used in meaning to strike as in injure and violate..